the imaginative conservative logo

A review of From Christendom to Americanism and Beyond by Thomas Storck (Angelico Press, 2015)

from christendom to americanism Thomas StorckThomas Storck is a well-connected man. Indeed there are very few men who are better connected. I don’t mean that he is well-connected in the sense that the world normally thinks of it. He does not have lots of powerful friends walking and stalking the corridors of power who can make things happen for him. On the contrary, he has so few friends in such places that this timely and important volume will not make the New York Times Bestseller List, nor will the wisdom it contains enlighten the endarkened pages of that powerfully prejudiced journal.

Mr. Storck is well-connected in a much better and more important sense. He knows and makes the connections between those branches of knowledge which have been severed from each other by the modern world’s radical disconnectedness with the wholeness of things. He makes these connections and connects himself and his understanding of things to this connectedness. Finally, as this volume and Mr. Storck’s other writings testify, he connects us to this connectedness, helping us to become the well-connected people that we need to be.

First and foremost, he connects the lesser sciences of philosophy, history, politics, and economics to the queen of sciences, theology. He knows that to separate theos from logos, God from meaning, is the beginning of the dis-integration of knowledge into disconnected and atomized “disciplines,” each of which is excommunicated from the others.

In philosophy, the humanism of the Renaissance, divorcing itself from the scholasticism that connected Man with his Creator, has led inexorably to the anthropocentrism which is the blight of our self-centred culture. In politics, such humanism has led to the cynical realpolitik of Machiavelli and the justification of Machiavellian self-interest over Christian concepts of social and political justice.

The separation of theos and logos has also led to the divorce of physics from metaphysics, separating what was once known as natural philosophy from all other aspects of the love of wisdom, thereby ensuring the decay of science into scientism.

Thomas Storck

Thomas Storck

Mr. Storck connects these radical problems, rooted in the story of man’s divorce from God, to the historical developments that led to the economic, social, political, and cultural problems facing our world today. In doing so, he reminds us of others who have endeavoured to do likewise. We think, perhaps, of the works of Christopher Dawson or R. H. Tawney; or of Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man, written as a charitable response and riposte to H.G. Wells’ superciliously “progressive” Outline of History; or of Hilaire Belloc’s own response to Wells, less charitable but nonetheless effective, in his Companion to Mr Wells’s “Outline of History.” Apart from his war of words with Wells, Belloc also wrote panoramic studies of history, such as The Servile State, Survivals and New Arrivals, and The Great Heresies, each of which illustrated that ideas have consequences and, more specifically, that bad ideas have bad consequences.

Like his illustrious forebears, Mr. Storck illustrates that one’s philosophical presuppositions will invariably and inevitably colour one’s understanding of the “outline of history.” He understands the beliefs of the past and why people acted as they did; he sees why things happened as well as when and how they happened. Such a vision of the past contrasts starkly with the “progressive” view of history, so much in the ascendant today, which regards the beliefs of the past as primitive and superstitious and therefore unworthy of serious consideration. This chronological snobbery blinds the secular historian from being able to see or comprehend the ideas that motivated the actions of the past, thereby preventing modernity’s understanding of history from rising above the when and the how. In stark and much needed contrast, Mr. Storck shows that the when and how are determined by the why.

Once again, Mr. Storck emerges as a worthy heir of Hilaire Belloc. “In history we must abandon the defensive,” Belloc had written in 1924, “…We must make our opponents understand not only that they are wrong in their philosophy, nor only ill-informed in their judgement of cause and effect, but out of touch with the past: which is ours.”[i]

Hilaire Belloc and G.K. Chesterton

Hilaire Belloc and G.K. Chesterton

Mr. Storck insists, like Messrs. Belloc, Chesterton, and Dawson, that the history of western civilization can only be comprehended if we see it as Christendom, as the cultural and political manifestation of the fruits of the Faith, and it is for this reason that he shows that the history of modernity can only be comprehended if we see it as an anthropocentric rebellion against Christendom and the Christocentrism that informed it.

As with Belloc’s mapping, in Survivals and New Arrivals and The Great Heresies, of the war of ideas that had forged the history of the modern world, Mr. Storck in the present volume illustrates the way in which the historian can emerge as a prophet, teaching us not only about the past but warning us of the abyss that we face in the future if the disastrous path we have been following is not abandoned. Like Belloc, Thomas Storck is not merely an historian but a prophet. He needs to be heard and heeded.

Books by Joseph Pearce may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore.  This article, slightly adapted, was first published as the Foreword to Mr. Storck’s book. It is published here with gracious permission of the author. 

Notes:

[i] Hilaire Belloc, Preface to Dom Hugh G. Bevenot, OSB, Pagan and Christian Rule, London, 1924, p.ix

Print Friendly
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
1 reply to this post
  1. [I tried earlier this evening to post this comment, but I used an icon for the check marks referred to therein – which I now suspect is something not supported on this website – and so I shall try reposting it without the check marks although the intent of my comment is not quite as clear now. Que sera, sera.]
    ___
    Joseph, I share your admiration for Thomas Storck. I started collecting essays of his (mostly from the pages of “New Oxford Review”) years before I converted to Catholicism; and I assigned them either none, one or two check marks based on how much they influenced me:

    “Hating The Body” ( December, 1999)
    “Sola Scriptura, an Impossible Theory” (December,2000)
    “Is There Such a Thing as ‘Mere Christianity’?” (July, 2001)
    “C.S. Lewis: Reason vs. Easy Assumptions” (November, 2002)
    “The Shrinking of Sacred Time” (January, 2003)
    “What Are Clothes For?” (April,2003)
    “The Corruption of Children’s Literature” (June, 1998)
    “The Americanization of the Globe” (February, 1998)
    ___
    oops…the third and second last ones were written by Inez Fitzgerald Storck. Possibly a relation and misfiled by me under Thomas Storck.

    As you can see, my list ends in the early “Noughts”, shortly before I bought my first computer. Since then, for me and most people, periodical literature is largely confined to cyberspace. I still subscribe to several worthy ones, but don’t feel the same pressing need to make hard copies. Fahrenheit 451 is a work of fiction, after all.

Please leave a thoughtful, civil, and constructive comment: