the imaginative conservative logo

The seemingly insignificant suppression of ladies and gentlemen on New York’s trains represents a giant step backward. It affirms that we need no longer behave like ladies and gentlemen, but rather like whatever we want to be, or happen to be, at the moment…

Passengers, customers, or whatever you want to call them are welcome to ride in the New York City transport system. Just don’t call them ladies or gentlemen. The city’s Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) has outlawed the expression in yet another bizarre episode of the politically-correct Culture War.[1]

“Ladies and gentlemen” is not inclusive enough for the thought police patrolling the lines. Never mind that conductors have been doing this for a century. Never mind that the automatic announcement systems are programmed with the old courtesy formulas. Never mind that passengers might even like to be addressed in this manner.

All this must be changed immediately on buses, trains, and stations. The MTA has ruled that conductors must now use new formulas that scrap the traditional “ladies and gentlemen,” suggesting “passengers” or “riders” as replacements. Conductors will be monitored by management for compliance. They must even manually override the automatic systems until new recordings can be made. Thus has it been decreed, and let no one dare do the contrary.

The Little Things are the Culture

Some people might think these small changes are insignificant. Such things make no difference in our daily lives. However, things like this are indicative of what is wrong with America today. They change the culture because little things are the culture.

Whenever a revolution breaks out, there is always an attempt to change the little things. Curiously, revolutionaries always change the manner of addressing people. The French Revolution of 1789 quickly stripped people of their titles, however humble, and insisted that everyone be called “citizen.”[2] The Russian Revolution in 1917 likewise made people equal by calling them “comrades.“

These were changes in the culture that indicated a shift in society’s way of understanding people. They were tiny alterations forced upon the people, and which promoted an ideological agenda. During these revolutions, the neutered terms of address signaled that everyone was completely equal in everything, including intelligence, ability, and talents. Using “comrade” signaled to all that the person was part of the communist tyranny that leveled society and controlled all aspects of life.

A Postmodern Diktat

Suppressing ladies and gentlemen has a particularly postmodern overtone.[3] “Citizen “and “comrade” at least identified people as something permanent. The new designation of “passenger” or “rider” resists a permanent condition and merely describes someone’s temporary state.

It fits well with the postmodern ambiguity that blurs all distinctions and hates all definitions. People are what they decide to be at the moment. People are encouraged to self-identify based on what they perceive themselves to be. It is not a coincidence that the suppressed terms were changed because they were not inclusive of “transgendered” passengers who did not feel comfortable being defined by our God-given male-female binary categories.

The train authority diktat is postmodernity at its worst. It reduces people to mere simulacra (to use their term) in which everything becomes insubstantial forms or semblances of something.

The Meaning of Ladies and Gentlemen

That is what is wrong with suppressing ladies and gentlemen. It strips people of their dignity. It takes away from both women and men all that is distinguished, honored, or worthy of respect.

When a woman was called a lady, it used to be a compliment.[4] In accepting this title, the woman is held to the high standard of behaving like a lady who appreciates grace, modesty, and beauty. It assumed a desire to be feminine and to glory in those qualities that today are so neglected.

When a man was called a gentleman, it was also a compliment.[5] It assumed a willingness to be held to high standards. Men were asked to overcome the more brutal part of their nature and display a masculine gentleness that spoke of courtesy, consideration, and protection—virtues that are now neglected.

When a group was addressed as “ladies and gentlemen,” it expressed a complementary and mutual respect between the two sexes. It had none of the class-struggle overtones of feminist propaganda. Instead, it celebrated the differences between the two with ceremony and distinction.

This treatment is the fruit of Christian civilization. It was the Church that first recognized and elevated the dignity of men, but especially women, who were so degraded in pagan lands and times. Christian morality created an atmosphere of charity, trust, and respect that both harmonized and protected the sexes.

 Return to Barbaric Ways

Thus, the seemingly insignificant suppression of ladies and gentlemen on New York’s trains represents a giant step backward. It affirms that we need no longer behave like ladies and gentlemen, but rather like whatever we want to be, or happen to be, at the moment.

We are free to revert to the barbaric ways of old. People are free to disrespect, harass, and offend everyone equally. Other people become merely the instruments of our gratification.

The recent sexual harassment scandals should come as no surprise. They are the product of a rotten culture where people no longer treat those around them as ladies and gentlemen.

The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics—we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.

Notes:

[1] “The Culture War is a clash of ideas about what one believes to be true, and others with different viewpoints. Your experiences, family, friends, education, and the media help to form your belief system or World View. Your World View determines where you stand in Culture War.” (“The Culture War“)

[2] Goyau, Georges. “French Revolution.” The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 13. (New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1912)

[3] Postmodern: “of, relating to, or being a theory that involves a radical reappraisal of modern assumptions about culture, identity, history, or language.” Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, definition 2b.

[4] Lady: “a woman who is refined, polite, and well-spoken.” Dictionary.com, definition 1.

[5] Gentleman: “a man whose conduct conforms to a high standard of propriety or correct behavior.” Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, definition 2c.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
4 replies to this post
  1. Perhaps a polite, genderless designation for the individuals running the MTA would be “bozos”, reflecting clown-like attributes. Then again that would reflect a permanent, rather than temporary status.
    Actually I take it all back – Bozo was (excuse the expression) male.

  2. I’m a New Yorker but I had not heard of this change. Admittedly I don’t ride the subways much anymore. This is a disgrace! It doesn’t even make sense. You’re either a lady or a gentleman, no matter what your sexual orientation or no matter what you’ve done to mutilate your genitalia. Sigh, I got to get out of New York.

  3. I agree that the little things- titles and such, are what move the erosive ideology in. I think that it all started when one day i referred to someone as an oriental and i got the soft, smile correction from someone that i had just used a racist term. I did not accept that then and i will not accept this now.

  4. Wait, maybe they are correct. Perhaps the riders are no longer ladies and gentlemen. Most are not nowadays. Might i suggest that the MTA consider the use of the term barbarian instead.

Please leave a thoughtful, civil, and constructive comment: