the imaginative conservative logo

von-misesLudwig von Mises was born on September 29, 1881, in the city of Lemberg in the Austro-Hungarian empire. His mother was Adele (Landau) von Mises; his father, Arthur Edler von Mises, a construction engineer in government service to the Ministry of Railroads, died at the age of forty-six (after a gall bladder operation) when Ludwig was a twenty-two-year-old university student. (Ludwig’s only sibling to survive into adulthood was his younger brother Richard, who was to become a noted mathematician, Harvard professor, and probability theorist.) Although his birthplace was hundreds of miles away from the imperial capital, Mises was to spend some forty years of his life in Vienna.

From the age of eleven, he spent about eight years attending the Academic Gymnasium in Vienna, after which he became a student in the Faculty of Law and Political Sciences at the University of Vienna. With an interruption of about one year’s military service (at the conclusion of which he received his commission as lieutenant in a reserve artillery regiment), Mises spent about five years at the university, winning high university honors in the areas of juridical studies, social sciences, and history of law, and being awarded the degree of Doctor of Laws in 1906.

The bulk of Mises’ work in economics up to this time was under the influence of teachers imbued directly or indirectly with the ideas of the German Historical School, and Mises had, by the time he received his doctorate, already published several scholarly works in historical economics research. Mises was, however, already beginning to rebel against the methodological and ideological tenets of that school, presumably partly as a result of his reading Carl Menger’s Grundsätze at the end of 1903—an experience which, he later described, made an “economist” of him. It was apparently after receiving his doctorate that Mises came under the powerful personal influence of Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk (who, after retiring from prestigious service as Minister of Finance of the Austro-Hungarian empire, began to conduct his famous seminar at the University of Vienna in 1905.) Mises attended Böhm-Bawerk’s seminar for a number of years until he was himself admitted to the (unsalaried) rank of privatdozent, permitting him to lecture at the university, in 1913. It was during this period that his own systematic understanding of economics developed, along the lines pioneered by Menger (with whom he had extensive personal discussions) and Böhm-Bawerk, culminating in Mises’ own pathbreaking 1912 work on monetary theory. This book established Mises as an important economic theorist in his own right, and was the foundation of his subsequent fame as a leading exponent of the “Austrian School.”

After several years of engagement in various professional economic responsibilities, Mises obtained a position in 1909 at the Austrian Chamber of Commerce (a quasi-governmental body directly concerned with national commercial and industrial policy). It was his work in this capacity which, especially after the end of World War I, thrust Mises squarely into the controversial public issues of his time and brought him into contact with many of the leading Austrian political, industrial, and financial personalities. Mises’ career as economist thus developed, from the very beginning, as one combining academic research and university teaching with the very practical work of an economic public policy specialist at the center of ferocious political and policy debates.

The old courtly world of Imperial Vienna, center of the vast but crumbling Austro-Hungarian Empire, was giving way to a postwar milieu in which entirely new economic and political winds were to blow with an unprecedented ferocity.

Mises was himself, in his old age, to write about the political and ideological currents already at work in continental Europe around the turn of the century. There is no doubt that the views he expressed reflect his youthful impressions of the social context within which his lifelong convictions were forged. Mises saw the controversies that raged between the dominant German intellectuals in social science and the Austrian economics led by Menger, and subsequently Böhm-Bawerk, as having a significance extending far beyond the substance or methodology of economic theory. Most of the German professors, Mises wrote, “more or less eagerly made propaganda in their writings and in their courses for the policies of the Imperial Government: authoritarian conservatism, Sozialpolitik, protectionism, huge armaments, and aggressive nationalism.” Mises saw the Mengarian School as the champion of liberalism, as the last intellectual source of hope for the preservation of freedom and civilization in the face of the dangers posed by statism and by Marxism. From his perspective at the outset of the last third of the twentieth century, Mises saw, in fact, a “straight line that leads from the work of the Historical School to Nazism,” from “Schmoller’s glorification of the Hohenzollern Electors and Kings, to Sombart’s canonization of Adolf Hitler.” In memoirs written several decades earlier (1940), Mises also traced the cataclysmic twentieth-century events for which Marxism and Nazism have been responsible to the teachings of the German Historical School. He reports that Menger had (apparently well before the turn of the century) foreseen that policies pursued by the European powers would “lead to a horrible war that will end with gruesome revolutions, with the extinction of European culture and the destruction of prosperity of all nations.” It was in this charged ideological atmosphere that Mises’ own ideas developed and crystallized.

Mises himself experienced the hardships of war. During World War I he saw active service at the front in the Carpathians as a first lieutenant, but after getting typhoid in 1917 he was called back to Vienna to work in the economics division of the Department of War. It was his work in that capacity, together with his reflections on the political turmoil which was to follow the conclusion of hostilities, which led him to publish his second book, Nation, Staat und Wirtschaft, in 1919. (The book was translated into English many years later by Professor Leland Yeager under the title Nation, State and Economy). Mises was later to describe that work as “a scientific book with political design. It was an attempt at alienating the affections of the German and Austrian public from National-Socialist (Nazi) ideas which then had no special name, and recommending reconstruction by democratic-liberal policy.”

This tone of the work captured the passion which was to characterize Mises’ writings throughout his life. He saw the results of his scientific work as enormously significant for practical policy, if a civilized society was to be created and preserved.

Books on the topic of this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore. Republished with gracious permission from The Intercollegiate Review (Fall 2016).

Print Friendly
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
4 replies to this post
  1. This is wonderful. I admire both men–author as well as subject. Kirzner is one of the greats who has never received his due. His work on entrepreneurship is simply astounding.

  2. “if a civilized society was to be created and preserved…”

    That’s our marching orders. And in this regard, LVM is critical, and many others are critical, as well. It’s a continual struggle for prosperity, culture, the arts, and the enemy of all of those, politics.

  3. I’m not sure whether it is apropriate to call Lemberg Mises’ birthplace when 86% of the population from at least 1873 onward used Polish, and 51% were Roman Catholics. It is rather clear that the proper name of the city is Lvov, though of course the formal government approved name at the time was Lemburg. But Mises of all people who distinguish between government propaganda and the real name of a thing or place. I could see myself, being more of a conservative than a libertarian, using Lemburg – but Mises? Hard to imagine. With his liberal nature I imagine he delighted in sticking it to the government and calling it Lvov – or at the very least practicing the liberalism initiated by the governnment towards Galicia and calling it Lvov.

    Then again, it would likewise be improper to call the city Lviv at present simply because of its’ ethnic population given the means by which this population found itself living in the present city. But this speaks to the wider point of distinguishing between nominal geopolitical designations and historicity or cultural roots.

    This is not a minor point because Mises himself would not have called his city “Lemberg” – I imagine – except in the purely linguistic sense of having to use a German word when speaking to Germans who did not speak the local language. If we read Erik Von Kuehnelt Leddihn’s “The Cultural Background of Ludvig Von Mises” we note that Lehhihn correctly calls the city Lvov, writing that Mises was born in Lvov – not Lemberg – and explaining why.

    Dr. Kirzner himself writes: “Most of the German professors, Mises wrote, “more or less eagerly made propaganda in their writings and in their courses for the policies of the Imperial Government: authoritarian conservatism, Sozialpolitik, protectionism, huge armaments, and aggressive nationalism.”

    In this spirit, Mises would likely have been opposed to calling the city Lemberg unless he was speaking in a very general sense as a foreigner identifies a foriegn city with a name that is not the native name of the city.

    Furthermore Leddihn clearly writes about Mises being Polish by culture, ergo I think Dr. Kirzner should edit his essay and change the name of the city from Lemberg to Lvov. As Leddihn makes clear in his essay about Mises “his Polish, more than his Jewish background was decisive for Mises earliest years.” It is true that Mises was politically an Austrian – no doubt prudently judging Austro-Hungary to be a greater practitioner of liberalism than either Russia or Prussia, but Mises’ political affiliation with Austria was a clear prudential judgement in favor of the claims of Poland to liberty. Supporting Austro-Hungary was supporting liberalism in Galicia which in turn was supporting freedom for Poles.

    Leddihn’s fine essay, for anyone interested, is available as a PDF at the Mises Institute website.

  4. Hi Brad. Hope this finds you and family well. You told me early on that you were interested in the study of entrepreneurship. I’ll try and dig up Kirzner’s work. I am still reading your well regarded Kirk biography. Congratulations. Fletch

Leave a Reply