the imaginative conservative logo

europe the spanish armadaThese are troubling times. Europe is apparently on the verge of meltdown. Unable to withstand the heat caused by the growing friction between the European Union and its member states, especially as the former tries to force an open-door immigration policy on its subject nations, there are fears that the melting pot might be melting. Such fears have been exacerbated by the rise of the New Right or what many would call the far right in Europe.

In Austria, the Freedom Party’s candidate, Norbert Hofer, won the first round of Austria’s presidential election on 24 April. In the second round run-off on 22 May, he will go head-to-head with an independent candidate aligned with the Green Party. Ominously, this is the first presidential election since World War Two in which the two main parties failed to qualify for the presidential run-off, their candidates coming fourth and fifth in the poll. Hofer’s victory follows in the wake of his party’s success in last year’s local elections in which the Freedom Party gained thirty per cent of the vote in Upper Austria, largely due to its stance against immigration.

In Bulgaria, the current Prime Minister, Boyko Borisov, has adopted a hardline stance on immigration. In Slovakia, the anti-immigration Peoples Party did well in this year’s election, winning fourteen parliamentary seats, the first time any of its members has ever been elected. In Sweden, the Swedish Democrats, a party similar in tone to UKIP, won forty-nine seats in the 2014 election, up from twenty in 2010. Now the third largest party in Sweden, it is anti-immigration, as well as being critical of the European Union.

In Finland, the Finns Party (previously the “True Finns”) came second in last year’s general election. Party leader Timo Soini is Finnish Foreign Minister in a coalition government. The party advocates strict immigration controls and argues that Finns, not migrants, take priority for social and healthcare spending. Its roots lie in rural Finland and it has championed welfare policies that give it a populist dimension.

europe islamThe wave of Middle Eastern immigration into Europe has massively boosted support for the Danish People’s Party. In the 2014 Euro-election, the DPP came top, winning twenty-seven per cent of the vote and getting four MEPs out of thirteen, doubling its representation. In the 2015 General Election the DPP received twenty-one per cent of the vote, becoming the second largest party in the Folketing, with thirty-seven MPs, up fifteen. It is now in government in coalition with the liberal Conservative Venstre party. The coalition has carried out a radical tightening of Danish immigration and asylum laws, which are now probably the strictest in the EU, except for Hungary, which, under populist Conservative Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, has taken the singularly radical step of erecting a great fence round the whole country! Orban also fueled controversy and touched a historically sensitive nerve by alluding to Hungary’s historic role bulwarking Europe against the forces of Islam.

In Poland, the Law and Justice Party achieved surprise victories in the 2015 presidential and parliamentary elections, largely due to the EU’s callous mishandling of the migrant crisis and the threat this was perceived to pose to Poland’s control of its own borders and society. Tellingly, support for the Law and Justice Party, and other similar parties, is coming mostly from young people. Polls showed that two-thirds of students who voted in the October 2015 parliamentary elections had cast their vote for parties with markedly Eurosceptic and anti-immigration policies.

Closer to home, the Front National in France has grown in popularity since its leader, Marine Le Pen, distanced herself publicly from her more hardline father, Jean Marie Le Pen, who had been the FN’s previous leader. The FN won 6.8 million votes in regional elections in 2015—its largest ever score. It was only stopped from taking control of its two target regions after the Socialists pulled out and urged supporters to back Nicolas Sarkozy’s conservatives. In 2014, the FN won the French European Parliament election, taking twenty-five per cent of the vote and gaining twenty-one MEPs. Marine Le Pen is now considered a serious contender in the 2017 Presidential Election. Needless to say, immigration and Islamic terrorism such as the Charlie Hebdo and Paris attacks have boosted support for the FN.

germanyIn Germany, Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany) has adopted a hardline anti-immigration stance since Frauke Petry took over as leader of this Eurosceptic party in July 2105. In the 2014 Euro-elections, they won 7.1 per cent of the vote, gaining seven MEPs. They have polled very well in State elections in 2015 and also in this year’s elections. This year, they came second in the Saxony-Anhalt elections, with 24.2 per cent of the vote, and third in prosperous Baden-Wuerttemberg, with 15.1 per cent and also third place in Rhineland-Palatinate, with 12.6 per cent. The AfD MEPs initially sat with the Danish Peoples Party and the UK Tories in the European Parliament but recently have aligned themselves with the Austrian Freedom Party. At its Party Congress on 1 May, 2016 the AfD adopted an explicitly anti-Islamic position, calling for a ban on burkas, minarets and calls to prayer under the slogan “Islam is not a part of Germany.” Few would seek to argue that the rise of AfD is part of the fallout from Angela Merkel’s “Let them all in” Syrian refugee policy.

In one sense, I could claim to have a more keen sense than most people of the way things are going in Europe. As an angry and disaffected youth, back in the 1970s and 1980s, long before my subsequent change of heart and conversion to Catholicism, I had been a leading member of the National Front, which would later metamorphose into the British National Party. I was a member of the National Front’s Executive Council and its National Directorate and was Chairman of its youth movement, the Young National Front. I was sentenced to prison twice, in 1982 and 1985, for “publishing material likely to incite racial hatred,” an offence under the Race Relations Act. One of my closest friends was Nick Griffin, later to become notorious as the leader of the BNP. I was best man at Nick’s wedding and co-edited a magazine with him. Perhaps, therefore, it could be suggested that I might have a sense of déjà vu as I observe the turbulent times in which we live. In some ways, I do. The similarities are striking. And yet in many ways, and perhaps in the most important ways, things are very different today.

europe quranRacism is always evil, as is any other manifestation of hatred towards our neighbours or our enemies. Christians can never espouse racism, nor can they support with a clear conscience parties that advocate racism. It is, however, unfair to suggest that anyone who is concerned about the Islamization of Europe or about the endemic corruption and overarching imperialism of the European Union is either a racist or a xenophobe. Such language is the sort of thoughtless knee-jerk reaction that is the death of rational discourse. Furthermore, it is the sort of demonizing and stereotyping of opponents of which the racists are themselves guilty. Against such dumbing-down of the real nature of the problem, I would argue, with Pope Benedict XVI among others, that there are three mutually incompatible and inimical forces at work in the international arena: secular globalism, radical Islam, and Christian orthodoxy. As Pope Benedict highlighted in his prophetic Regensburg Address, the clash between these forces is at the troubled heart of our darkening world.

This struggle for the heart of Europe was encapsulated by a young priest, Father Jacek Międlar, at a rally of almost 100,000 patriotic Poles in Warsaw in November last year. Comparing efforts by the European Union to force Poland to accept large scale Islamic immigration, he likened the EU’s coercion of the Polish people to the oppression of the Soviet occupation.

‘Dearly beloved,’ the priest continued, ‘we’re not afraid of the peaceful Muslims, but they’re a minority. We’re afraid of fundamentalism. We do not want violence, we do not want aggression in the name of Allah…. We must oppose it. We do not want the hatred that is in the Koran, in Surah 5 [expressed for Jews and Christians], but we want the love and truth of the Gospel. We want to fight with the sword of love and truth, to which Saint Paul the Apostle calls us in the sixth chapter [of the Epistle] to the Ephesians [6:14-17]. The Gospel, and not the Quran!’


‘The Gospel,’ the thousands in the crowd roared again and again. ‘And not the Quran!’


‘Leftist and Islamic aggression aimed at everything Christian and national makes us very afraid,’ Father Międlar continued. ‘But we’re also afraid that our fear will turn into hatred. And we, as Christians, cannot let this happen. That’s why we, the Christians, want dialogue. But no one wants to talk to us, instead calling us fascists, racists, xenophobes, and infidel dogs. We can never allow this [succumbing to hatred]. We don’t want to fight with the hammer of hate they [the socialists and the Islamic fundamentalists] want to push in our hands…. We want to fight with the sword of truth. With the sword of love! With the sword of the Gospel! With the Sword that is Jesus Christ, our living Lord and Saviour.’

Although many of us are unaccustomed to such stridency, especially on the part of the clergy, and though many of us might baulk at the crusading language, the words of this young priest are nonetheless a challenge for us all. In a world of rising secular fundamentalism and rampant Islamic fundamentalism, what are we, as Christians, called to do? Do we say and do nothing? Wouldn’t such inertia and inaction in the face of the forces of evil and their destructive consequences constitute a mortal sin of omission? Might it not be mortal, not only to the individual soul who refuses to resist the evil, but mortal also to the culture he is called to defend? Isn’t a refusal to resist the culture of death itself deadly? Do we have the right to do nothing?

EUOne is reminded of the words attributed to Edmund Burke that all that is needed for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Racism is an evil which must be fought, but so is the secularist imperialism of the European Union. So, too, is the Islamization of European culture. Such evils must be fought with the love of God and the goodness of His Gospel and not with the tools of hatred that the Devil delivers to those he calls his own. This is the real challenge: to fight evil without succumbing to evil in doing so.

If we pursue the noble goal in such a noble manner, dare we hope for a restoration of a Europe of the Nations, and perhaps, by the grace of God, a resurrection of the Europe of the Faith? Perhaps this is merely the nurturing of a wild and quixotic whim, an impossible dream. Perhaps it is. Yet even an impossible dream is preferable to the all too possible nightmare that we are currently facing. And as for the impossible, let’s remember that all things are possible with God.

Books by Joseph Pearce may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore. This essay originally appeared in Catholic Herald (Spring 2016) and is republished here with gracious permission.


Print Friendly
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
2 replies to this post
  1. We do live in greatly troubling times Mr. Pearce, and the message herein that we cannot allow ourselves to do evil in fighting evil is the challenge each of us has in the sphere in which each of us live. It is something that greatly vexes me right now and I thank you for your message of grace.

  2. Alas, thanks to the vagaries of European history, the Left was stridently anti-clerical and hence anti-Christian. A grievous error. This made the Right seem to be a natural ally for Christians of all stripes. A most grievous error.

    There is no such thing as a “political” Christianity, although there is nothing wrong with Christians being engaged in politics. But when Holy Mother Church, the spotless Bride of Christ, hops in bed with the political system, she becomes the Whore of Babylon. And is treated as such by the politicos who gladly use and abuse her, and spurn her every word.

    C. S. Lewis described it best in The Screwtape Letters, as Uncle Screwtape advises how to destroy the Church — First encourage “Christianity Plus X”, with X seen as a necessary component of the Gospel. Then, move to “X Plus Christianity” as X becomes the most important part of the Message. Finally, transition to “X” alone, and leave Christianity behind as a pathetic remnant of childish belief.

    The “job” of the Church, of Christianity, is not the same as the “job” of politics and politicians. It is not even in the same area of concern. As noted, Christians may do politics, some argue they are obliged to do politics, a claim which I find dubious at best. (A priest has better things to do than lead or involve in political campaigns.)

    At best, the Church’s Teachings should inform conscience which may translate into political action. Or it may not. Which is a decision the individual Christian must make according to his/her own circumstances, after prayer and meditation. It is certainly nothing which can be given blanket diktat, especially by cynical political operatives seeking to use and abuse Christians for their own nefarious purposes.

    To remain vigilant, and aloof from ephemeral partisan bickering, but ready to step in with the Teaching of the Church (and not to ignore or suppress it for political advantage) and so inform the debate would seem the best course in these times.

Leave a Reply