The misguided effort to damage the statue of John C. Calhoun in Charleston is a sign of how we as contemporary Americans have a tendency to “forget who we are” and engage in what has become known as political correctness. In fact, diversity of thought is the opposite of political correctness, and is at the heart of a free society.
We understand and sympathize with people’s anger and frustration about recent events in Charleston, but the misguided effort to damage the statue of Vice-President John C. Calhoun in Marion Square, as well as the many other destructive acts throughout the nation, is a sign of how we as contemporary Americans have a tendency to “forget who we are” and engage in what has become known as political correctness.
The advocates of political correctness want to corrupt history for temporary political gains more than they desire to keep or restore it, and their efforts are, sadly, a disease on the body politic.
The operatives of political correctness have met with some success of late.
With Orwellian irony, they succeeded in having a U.S Navy ship named for a person who hated the Navy (Cesar Chavez) and have imposed “speech codes” (with the actual purpose of restricting speech) on many college campuses—as well as more destructive examples of assaulting First Amendment rights and redefining history.
The greatest threat to political correctness is an environment in which free and uninhibited discussion and disagreement can take place. In fact, diversity of thought is the opposite of political correctness, and is at the heart of a free society.
The proponents of political correctness–and those who wish to vandalize public monuments–stand on the side of censorship against free and diverse discussion.
Equally misguided, the defacers want to misrepresent and vilify one of America’s greatest statesmen, John Caldwell Calhoun. Born in 1782 near Abbeville, S.C., Calhoun graduated from Yale College and Litchfield Law School. It should also be remembered that the monument itself was erected from the contributions of dimes and nickels from impoverished southern people after Reconstruction to show their support for their state and Calhoun.
He served two terms in the South Carolina Legislature until elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1811. As a congressman, Calhoun’s reputation was that of a moral statesman who regarded limited government and patriotism as synonymous.
President James Monroe asked Calhoun to assume the helm at the War Department (later given the more politically correct title of Department of Defense) in 1817, where he served until 1825, and he is described as the ablest war secretary the country had before the Civil War, while offering a fairer and more humane approach to Native American affairs than his predecessors.
While spending most of his public life in the United States Senate, he was also vice president under both John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson–and he served as secretary of state to John Tyler.
He is generally regarded as one of the greatest senators ever, part of the “Great Triumvirate” with Henry Clay and Daniel Webster–and each supported the Fugitive Slave Act.
What the deliberate destructors of the monument do not want you to know is that Calhoun was not only one of America’s greatest statesmen, but also one of its greatest thinkers. His two treatises on American politics, the Disquisition and Discourse (published after his death), demonstrate his hope that America could avoid the pending conflict of the Civil War.
His persistent fear was that unpatriotic sectionalism would lead to civil war and a dissolution of the union. His last years were spent attempting to unify the country. On March 31, 1850, Calhoun died in Washington, D.C.
In Calhoun’s interpretation, America’s greatest hope lay in the interposing and amending power of the states, which was implicit in the Constitution. This alone could save the country by allowing for a greater diffusion of authority and undermining the cause of sectional conflict. Calhoun’s purpose was the preservation of the original balance of authority and the fortification of the American political system against the obstacles it faced.
The vandals may have good intentions, but as Shakespeare warned, “men are men; the best sometimes forget.” John Calhoun was imperfect, but he remains one of the greatest statesmen in American history.
Leave Charleston’s—and America’s—monuments for posterity, and for the rising generation.
The Imaginative Conservative applies the principle of appreciation to the discussion of culture and politics—we approach dialogue with magnanimity rather than with mere civility. Will you help us remain a refreshing oasis in the increasingly contentious arena of modern discourse? Please consider donating now.
The featured image, uploaded by AudeVivere, is a photograph of the John C. Calhoun statue in Marion Square, Charleston, South Carolina. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic license, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
Hear, hear!
One of Yale’s twelve residential colleges is named after Calhoun. From time to time, the ahistorical revisionists argue that the name should be changed, because Calhoun was not enlightened enough for them. Expect another push.
As for me, I prefer my history real, warts and all. So, Calhoun, like any other occupant of public office, was flawed. So what? So he doesn’t comport with early 21st sensibilities. So, what? He was a towering figure of his time, and worth remembering and respecting.
Shall we forget that Calhoun spoke of the Declaration was based on a “self-evident lie”? To remember, or better yet, to discuss this part of Calhoun is not to engage in a politically-correct crusade; it is to have an honest conversation about history. To evade this side of Calhoun — including the very real role he played in Southern sectionalism — is to confine oneself to preaching to the choir.
“I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good—a positive good.” — John C. Calhoun
One of the problems we now face as a nation is our skewed vision of “reality”. As a counselor, clients often wax elegant in their lengthy description of their faults and failings. Such is the “conversation” in the country about race. White people are vilified as eternally racist with their faults examined and examined and examined…. Equal crimes are prosecuted unequally.
The question is, is a recitation of faults the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Who died to free the slaves? What value do we give to their last full measure of devotion? Who supported black individuals to participate in government prior to the democrat takeover of the south? Who supported the many civil rights bills brought before Congress in the twentieth century? Who paid much of the taxes needed for the many programs enacted to benefit the less successful? There are many more questions equally important.
An enduring truth is that truth has never consisted of only the bad.