the imaginative conservative logo

Jack_and_the_Giants_image10 fairy tales holy weekOne of my favorites passages in Dante’s Purgatorio is when Dante finally reaches the summit of Mount Purgatory and enters the Earthly Paradise—that is, the Garden of Eden. It makes good theological sense that Dante imagines the topography of Purgatory this way. For having purged his intellect, will and passions from the ill effects of his sin, Dante is now wholly innocent again. He is like Adam and Eve before the Fall. And so it is appropriate that, before he ascends to the celestial Paradise, he be given a glimpse of heaven on earth.

In the Earthly Paradise Dante meets a beautiful lady named Matelda, who tells him that he has come to the place “fashioned to be the natural nest for man.” Matelda explains:

“The Highest Good, pleased in Itself alone,

made man good, and for Good, and gave him this

place as an earnest of eternal peace.

By his own fault, man did not dwell here long.

by his own fault, he took up grief and toil,

pawning his honest laughter and sweet play.”

The Earthly Paradise, depicted by Dante in lush, bucolic imagery, is “an earnest of eternal peace.” For all its beauty, it is still a mere forerunner of the beauty and peace that await Dante in Heaven. But in lines I especially like, Matelda adds this:

“A corollary granted as a grace.

It will, I think, be no less dear to you,

for I will walk beyond my promises.

The poets in their melodies of old

may have dreamed on Parnassus of this spot,

singing about the happy age of gold.

For here the human race was innocent;

forever spring, and fruit upon the vine.

This is the nectar which the poets meant.”

Images of a “happy age of gold” were a commonplace in ancient poetry (in Greek mythology, Mount Parnassus was home to the Muses). Matelda is saying that when ancient poets wrote of golden ages where all was Spring and innocence, they were in fact, whether they realized it or not, “dreaming” of the Garden of Eden.

It may be a stretch, but I believe fairy tales, or many of them at any rate, fall into the category of stories that depict golden ages, and thus are dreams of Eden—as well as of that greater Paradise of which Eden itself is but a dream. J.R.R. Tolkien, in his famous essay entitled, “On Fairy Stories,” argues that, at its best, the fairy story or fantasy is far from being a flight from reality; it is, rather, a flight to reality. According to Brad Birzer, in his book J.R.R. Tolkien’s Sanctifying Myth, Tolkien understands the fairy story as a pathway toward reality insofar as it

  1. illuminates the vast inheritance our ancestors have bequeathed to us;
  2. gives us a new sense of wonder about things we have taken for granted or which have become commonplace (Tolkien writes that fairy stories allow us to see “things as we are (or were) meant to see them”);
  3. and provides us with a means to escape the drabness, conformity, and mechanization of modernity.

The desire to escape the nightmare aspects of modernity, Birzer warns, is not the same thing as wanting to escape from reality—quite the opposite, in fact. In the best kind of fairy tale, writes Birzer, “[w]e still deal with life and death, comfort and discomfort. We merely escape progressivism and the progressive dream, which reduces all of complex reality to a mere shadow of creation’s true wonders.”

The “progressive dream,” in which human beings reject God and seek to divinize themselves by mastering nature, is thus the very opposite of the “dream of an earthly paradise” that we find in the best fairy tales, such as those written by Tolkien himself. Is not a Middle-Earth after Sauron’s defeat, where the hobbits in Hobbiton can tend their gardens and eat their multiple breakfasts, where justice and peace reign in Gondor now that the rightful line of kings has been restored—is this not an image of a “happy age of gold”?

On this the holiest week in the Christian calendar, we call to mind another and far greater fairy story. Turning the above analysis on its head, the fairy story we celebrate this week is not a dream of some other, more real paradise. No, this fairy tale is the reality compared to which everything else in our lives is but a dream.

In Holy Week we celebrate the paradigm case of what Tolkien argues is the most essential element of a great fairy tale:  eucatastrophe—a word that means “a good disaster.” The great fairy tales, says Tolkien, always show us a defeat that turns out to be the source of unexpected victory. In this way, the realm of fairy gives us a “fleeting glimpse of Joy, Joy beyond the walls of the world.” But the greatest eucatastrophe of all is of course the great defeat we recall in the coming days, a defeat that turns out to be, wondrously, the very means of Christ’s victory over death. Christ’s Passion, Death and Resurrection is the greatest of all fairy tales, precisely because it is the one fairy tale that happens to be true.

It was probably from G.K. Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man that Tolkien gained the insight that allowed him to say: “The heart of Christianity is a myth which is also a fact.” Tolkien’s friend C.S. Lewis similarly affirms that in Christianity, “[t]he old myth of the Dying God, without ceasing to be myth, comes down from the heaven of legend and imagination to the earth of history.”

With the Incarnation of Christ, Tolkien further proclaims, “art has been verified. God is the Lord, of angels, and of men—and of elves. Legend and History have met and fused.”

Our natural love of myth, of the fairy story, is a manifestation of our desire for a Reality that can only be fully satisfied in Christ. Yet this natural love of fairy tales, like every natural impulse, can fail to mature. In the same essay on fairy stories, Tolkien writes:

Fantasy is a natural human activity. It certainly does not destroy or even insult Reason; and it does not either blunt the appetite for, nor obscure the perception of, scientific veracity. On the contrary. The keener and clearer is the reason, the better fantasy will it make. If men were ever in a state in which they did not want to know or could not perceive truth (facts or evidence), then Fantasy would languish until they were cured. If they ever get into that state (it would not seem at all impossible), Fantasy will perish, and become Morbid Delusion.

One wonders whether our popular culture’s perduring fascination with movies featuring “updated” fairy tales and superheroes is settled deep into such Morbid Delusion. In the past year we’ve seen updates on Snow White, The Wizard of Oz, the continuing mushrooming of Marvel and DC superhero franchises, even The Hobbit itself presented as a three-film serial, and one is not always edified by what Hollywood has done with these fairy tales. Yet in another sense it is promising that our culture is still fascinated by them. Kate Bernheimer, professor at the University of Arizona and editor of the journal Fairy Tale Review, has cited a need in our technologically-crazed time to reconnect with the nature of fairy-tale environments and the “uncanny pull that the ‘ever after’ holds in an age of extinction.”

During this Holy Week, perhaps we can also pray that the “uncanny pull” so many feel toward the “ever after” will lead to a deeper reflection on the paradises, earthly and heavenly, from which the fairy stories we enjoy get their point and purpose. For only when we realize that the myths we love have actually become fact, will our stories once again be healthy dreams of a real world where everything is “honest laughter and sweet play.”

* For quotations from and analysis of Tolkien’s essay “On Fairy Stories,” this post is deeply indebted to Brad Birzer’s discussion in J.R.R. Tolkien’s Sanctifying Myth. Also, the translation of the Purgatorio I use is that of Anthony Esolen.

Books mentioned in this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore.

Print Friendly
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
5 replies to this post
  1. A lyrical and thoughtful piece for which I have (with apologies) a pedantic or niggling question. Where fairy-folk remain fairly vivid memories (for example, Hunza in Pakistan’s Hindu Kush mountains) fairies are vicious little creatures with needle-sharp teeth; a carnivorous threat to humans. I wonder if they were not once the same in Europe, and then either their depictions were pacified by the spread of Christianity, or bowdlerised by the 19th Century writers who collected and published the tales (from the Grimms to Scott to Lang). The legendary sprites supposedly controlled by Master Michael Scot (a Scots Borders-country Churchman presumably innocent of diabolism) may have been older than the 13th C man himself, and they retain hints of malevolence even in their 19th C versions, which “smell” of being altered by Christianity and then the Enlightenment. Would anyone care to speculate?

    In any case this would not alter the current mythic value of (even modernised) fairy-tales.

  2. Dr. McInerny: Even from my admittedly non-Christian perspective, the “uncanny pull” you describe is a fundamental and too-often ignored fact of human existence. Whatever its origin, its significance, or its ultimate fate, it does engender myths, dreams, and fairy tales, without which we would be impoverished. Particularly during Holy Week, it would be ungracious for a non-believer to question anyone’s “dreams of a real world where everything is “‘honest laughter and sweet play'”. I hope such a world exists, or can exist, or will exist. Thank you for this post.

    • Thank you so much, Jack, for your gracious reply. Yes, I believe the “uncanny pull” is the very heart of our love of story (of all kinds, really), not to mention of our longing for an everlasting goodness. I very much appreciate your thoughts. With every good wish, Dan

  3. Oops. Never mind. Silly me.

    “Also, the translation of the Purgatorio I use is that of Anthony Esolen.”

Leave a Reply