the imaginative conservative logo

confucian proper order The illustrious ancients, when they wished to make clear and to propagate the highest virtues in the world, put their states in proper order. Before putting their states in proper order, they regulated their families. Before regulating their families, they cultivated their own selves. Before cultivating their own selves, they perfected their souls. Before perfecting their souls, they tried to be sincere in their thoughts. Before trying to be sincere in their thoughts, they extended to the utmost their knowledge. Such investigation of knowledge lay in the investigation of things, and in seeing them as they really were. When things were thus investigated, knowledge became complete. When knowledge was complete, their thoughts became sincere. When their thoughts were sincere, their souls became perfect. When their souls were perfect, their own selves became cultivated. When their selves were cultivated, their families became regulated. When their families were regulated, their states came to be put into proper order. When their states were in proper order, then the whole world became peaceful and happy.

For more on Confucius and proper order visit The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore.

We hope you will join us in The Imaginative Conservative community. The Imaginative Conservative is an on-line journal for those who seek the True, the Good and the Beautiful. We address culture, liberal learning, politics, political economy, literature, the arts and the American Republic in the tradition of Russell Kirk, T.S. Eliot, Edmund Burke, Irving Babbitt, Paul Elmer More, Wilhelm Roepke, Robert Nisbet, M.E. Bradford, Eric Voegelin, Christopher Dawson and other leaders of Imaginative Conservatism (Visit our Bookstore to find books by/about these men) .

We address a wide variety of major issues including: What is the essence of conservatism? What was the role of faith in the American Founding? Is liberal learning still possible in the modern academy? Should conservatives and libertarians be allies? What is the proper role for the American Republic in spreading ordered liberty to other cultures/nations?

We have a great appreciation for the thought of Russell Kirk, T.S. Eliot, Irving Babbitt and Christopher Dawson, among other imaginative conservatives. However, some of us look at the state of Western culture and the American Republic and see a huge dark cloud which seems ready to unleash a storm that may well wash away what we most treasure of our inherited ways. Others focus on the silver lining which may be found in the next generation of traditional conservatives who have been inspired by Dr. Kirk and his like. We hope that The Imaginative Conservative answers T.S. Eliot’s call to “redeem the time, redeem the dream.”

Print Friendly
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
3 replies to this post
  1. I have been thinking that a basic (very basic) book on "The Beauty of Honesty" might be in order. We have had stirring insights into Truth, Beauty and Goodness, but for right now; something very basic is needed. I have read theological accounts (St Thomas in the summa) of honesty and heard homilies (somewhat) on the subject from a more lofty point of view. I do see a need for something very basic. Something that expresses why white lies may not make you happy or how living an honest life frees one to be more than a base donkey. Honesty starts with seeing oneself for who one really is. Such a very honest thing to do and by far, one of the most difficult endeavors one will ever undertake. It is a seed worth planting I think.

  2. MaterMax, do it, please! Test-drive your chapters here on TIC. Meanwhile, no cynicism intended, do we need a small chapter on the beauty of dishonesty? I do not stop at the folly of telling one's spouse that she looks fat in that suit, a common instance where honesty is wholly counterproductive. When the Romans said that 'hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue,' they acknowledged the likelihood of sin but appreciated lip-service, at least, to real and eternal values. The all too common modern equivalent is admitting a sin as a "lifestyle decision," because, pop-psychologically, "that's just the way I am."

Please leave a thoughtful, civil, and constructive comment: