the imaginative conservative logo

 conservativeOur pessimism begins with the realization that very few of our neighbors subscribe to such views today, maybe excepting the “loathing of public debt, taxes, and excises.” As Professors Frohnen and Birzer state, with the Louisiana Purchase, the original republican himself, Jefferson politically succumbed to the impulse to expand the nation and inflate the desires of a restless people. The modern American identity has become synonymous with expansion, with inflationary expectations, where a wise understanding of limitation, or “inner-check”, has become anathema. Richard Weaver called this “the spoiled-child psychology,” the belief of the mass man that “there is nothing that he cannot know…and there is nothing that he cannot have.”

In this decadent world, order is not transcendent, it is not the result of the great work of time, but is rather the ephemeral result of the consumption faculty. “We have given them a technique of acquisition,” wrote Weaver, “how much comfort can we take in the way they employ it?” Imaginative conservatives in the school of Kirk take long views, and, as Dr. Kirk often reminded us, religion and ethics trump politics. Nevertheless, it is easy to understand why many of us grieve the passing of the old Republic. As John Randolph defined it–and where Dr. Kirk began his foray into historical scholarship–republican principles meant “love of peace, hatred of offensive war; jealousy of the State Governments towards the General Government, and the influence of the Executive Government over the co-ordinate branches of that Government; a dread of standing armies; a loathing of public debt, taxes, and excises; tenderness for the liberty of the citizen; jealousy, Argus-eyed jealousy, of the patronage of the President….”

As conservatives–as teachers–we must stand with the philosophers and the theologians against the sophists and keep asking, “to what end?” Kirk urged us to look deeper than politics, to take long views, to seek out clearer distinctions, and to flesh out a deeper understanding.

How do we redeem the time? As everyone on TIC has affirmed, we start by “brightening the corner where we are,” by improving ourselves, by helping our neighbors, by loving our families, by setting high standards for our students, and by exercising the inherited liberty bequeathed to us from the founders, responsibly, yet joyfully. “Freedom is something that gathers around the hearth, inheres in local associations, and endears to a man his place of habitation. It was a protection to enable him to enjoy things, not a force or power to enable him to do things,” wrote Weaver. And always reflect upon and advocate the permanent things.

Books mentioned in this essay may be found in The Imaginative Conservative Bookstore.

Print Friendly

Published: Jul 28, 2010
Glenn Davis
Glenn A. Davis is a Senior Contributor at The Imaginative Conservative. He is the Academic Dean at All Saints Episcopal School in Lubbock, Texas where he teaches Latin and Russian. He holds a Ph.D. in Slavic Languages and Literatures from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. His dissertation topic was Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s historical imagination. He has published in the Slavic and East European Journal, Christianity and Literature, Modern Age, and Humanitas.
"All comments are subject to moderation. We welcome the comments of those who disagree, but not those who are disagreeable."
2 replies to this post
  1. Thanks very much, Glenn. And, yet, ironically, those westering tended to be the most deeply conservative and constitutionally-oriented of all Americans. At least according to John Philip Reid.

  2. Thank you, Brad, for your comment. You are absolutely right about the conservative convictions of those in the west. Living in the upper mid-west for several years (even in Madison!) and my time in Texas have helped me understand at a much deeper level what Dr. Kirk wrote about. But these words of that good westerner, Irving Babbitt, from "Democracy and Leadership," haunt my understanding of westering: "We in this country…have received a peculiar psychic twist from the fact that we have had endless elbowroom. A chief danger both to ourselves and others is that we shall continue to have a frontier psychology long after we have ceased to have a frontier. For a frontier psychology is expansive, and expansiveness…is, at least in its political manifestations, always imperialistic."

Leave a Reply